| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
This now prints nested form fields correctly.
* Needed a separate string format for the container field.
* Had to use `consp`, otherwise `nil` checkbox values wouldn't be
recognised and a corresponding `<value/>` line wouldn't be printed.
* Needed to add a missing nested field to the test's expected value.
|
|
Checkboxes don't work on IRS tax forms using the current flat XFDF
structure. In order to activate them, their values must be set using a
nested, or hierarchical field structure.
Add a test to facilitate development of nested XFDF field generation.
|
|
Originally took this idea from Steve Losh's cl-digraph:
https://github.com/sjl/cl-digraph/blob/936a18cb7de3a7c7e59c244cf4326f217afec85f/test/tests.lisp
However, it turns out it wasn't necessary, as I can reference the 1am
`run` function directly in the ASDF `test-op`.
|
|
Write `<field>` elements to the XFDF XML based on the cons cells in the
`fields` input list.
Change true and nil values to the FDF/XFDF checkbox value format of
"Yes" and "Off".
Also decided to use lowercase `t` to match the case of `nil`. Not sure
if that makes sense.
|
|
Write a test for the `write-xfdf` function.
Worked out how to create the test system from:
- https://lispcookbook.github.io/cl-cookbook/testing.html
- https://github.com/sjl/cl-digraph/blob/master/cl-digraph.test.asd
- https://github.com/fukamachi/dexador/blob/master/dexador-test.asd
Add the test string to the `write-xfdf` function to pass the test and
check that the test runner is set up correctly.
|
