aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/rest_framework/serializers.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'rest_framework/serializers.py')
-rw-r--r--rest_framework/serializers.py28
1 files changed, 14 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/rest_framework/serializers.py b/rest_framework/serializers.py
index d417ca80..af8aeb48 100644
--- a/rest_framework/serializers.py
+++ b/rest_framework/serializers.py
@@ -608,20 +608,20 @@ class ModelSerializer(Serializer):
})
_related_class = PrimaryKeyRelatedField
- def create(self, validated_attrs):
+ def create(self, validated_data):
"""
We have a bit of extra checking around this in order to provide
descriptive messages when something goes wrong, but this method is
essentially just:
- return ExampleModel.objects.create(**validated_attrs)
+ return ExampleModel.objects.create(**validated_data)
If there are many to many fields present on the instance then they
cannot be set until the model is instantiated, in which case the
implementation is like so:
- example_relationship = validated_attrs.pop('example_relationship')
- instance = ExampleModel.objects.create(**validated_attrs)
+ example_relationship = validated_data.pop('example_relationship')
+ instance = ExampleModel.objects.create(**validated_data)
instance.example_relationship = example_relationship
return instance
@@ -633,8 +633,8 @@ class ModelSerializer(Serializer):
# If we don't do this explicitly they'd likely get a confusing
# error at the point of calling `Model.objects.create()`.
assert not any(
- isinstance(field, BaseSerializer) and not field.read_only
- for field in self.fields.values()
+ isinstance(field, BaseSerializer) and (key in validated_attrs)
+ for key, field in self.fields.items()
), (
'The `.create()` method does not suport nested writable fields '
'by default. Write an explicit `.create()` method for serializer '
@@ -644,17 +644,17 @@ class ModelSerializer(Serializer):
ModelClass = self.Meta.model
- # Remove many-to-many relationships from validated_attrs.
+ # Remove many-to-many relationships from validated_data.
# They are not valid arguments to the default `.create()` method,
# as they require that the instance has already been saved.
info = model_meta.get_field_info(ModelClass)
many_to_many = {}
for field_name, relation_info in info.relations.items():
- if relation_info.to_many and (field_name in validated_attrs):
- many_to_many[field_name] = validated_attrs.pop(field_name)
+ if relation_info.to_many and (field_name in validated_data):
+ many_to_many[field_name] = validated_data.pop(field_name)
try:
- instance = ModelClass.objects.create(**validated_attrs)
+ instance = ModelClass.objects.create(**validated_data)
except TypeError as exc:
msg = (
'Got a `TypeError` when calling `%s.objects.create()`. '
@@ -679,10 +679,10 @@ class ModelSerializer(Serializer):
return instance
- def update(self, instance, validated_attrs):
+ def update(self, instance, validated_data):
assert not any(
- isinstance(field, BaseSerializer) and not field.read_only
- for field in self.fields.values()
+ isinstance(field, BaseSerializer) and (key in validated_attrs)
+ for key, field in self.fields.items()
), (
'The `.update()` method does not suport nested writable fields '
'by default. Write an explicit `.update()` method for serializer '
@@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ class ModelSerializer(Serializer):
(self.__class__.__module__, self.__class__.__name__)
)
- for attr, value in validated_attrs.items():
+ for attr, value in validated_data.items():
setattr(instance, attr, value)
instance.save()
return instance