diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/topics/2.2-announcement.md | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/topics/2.3-announcement.md | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/topics/documenting-your-api.md | 8 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/topics/kickstarter-announcement.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/topics/release-notes.md | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/topics/rest-framework-2-announcement.md | 4 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/topics/writable-nested-serializers.md | 10 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | docs/tutorial/1-serialization.md | 2 |
8 files changed, 22 insertions, 22 deletions
diff --git a/docs/topics/2.2-announcement.md b/docs/topics/2.2-announcement.md index a997c782..1df52cff 100644 --- a/docs/topics/2.2-announcement.md +++ b/docs/topics/2.2-announcement.md @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ The 2.2 release makes a few changes to the API, in order to make it more consist The `ManyRelatedField()` style is being deprecated in favor of a new `RelatedField(many=True)` syntax. -For example, if a user is associated with multiple questions, which we want to represent using a primary key relationship, we might use something like the following: +For example, if a user is associated with multiple questions, which we want to represent using a primary key relationship, we might use something like the following: class UserSerializer(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer): questions = serializers.PrimaryKeyRelatedField(many=True) @@ -58,10 +58,10 @@ The change also applies to serializers. If you have a nested serializer, you sh class Meta: model = Track fields = ('name', 'duration') - + class AlbumSerializer(serializer.ModelSerializer): tracks = TrackSerializer(many=True) - + class Meta: model = Album fields = ('album_name', 'artist', 'tracks') @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ For example, is a user account has an optional foreign key to a company, that yo This is in line both with the rest of the serializer fields API, and with Django's `Form` and `ModelForm` API. -Using `required` throughout the serializers API means you won't need to consider if a particular field should take `blank` or `null` arguments instead of `required`, and also means there will be more consistent behavior for how fields are treated when they are not present in the incoming data. +Using `required` throughout the serializers API means you won't need to consider if a particular field should take `blank` or `null` arguments instead of `required`, and also means there will be more consistent behavior for how fields are treated when they are not present in the incoming data. The `null=True` argument will continue to function, and will imply `required=False`, but will raise a `PendingDeprecationWarning`. diff --git a/docs/topics/2.3-announcement.md b/docs/topics/2.3-announcement.md index 7c800afa..9c9f3e9f 100644 --- a/docs/topics/2.3-announcement.md +++ b/docs/topics/2.3-announcement.md @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ As an example of just how simple REST framework APIs can now be, here's an API w class GroupViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet): model = Group - + # Routers provide an easy way of automatically determining the URL conf router = routers.DefaultRouter() router.register(r'users', UserViewSet) @@ -197,13 +197,13 @@ Usage of the old-style attributes continues to be supported, but will raise a `P For most cases APIs using model fields will behave as previously, however if you are using a custom renderer, not provided by REST framework, then you may now need to add support for rendering `Decimal` instances to your renderer implementation. -## ModelSerializers and reverse relationships +## ModelSerializers and reverse relationships The support for adding reverse relationships to the `fields` option on a `ModelSerializer` class means that the `get_related_field` and `get_nested_field` method signatures have now changed. In the unlikely event that you're providing a custom serializer class, and implementing these methods you should note the new call signature for both methods is now `(self, model_field, related_model, to_many)`. For reverse relationships `model_field` will be `None`. -The old-style signature will continue to function but will raise a `PendingDeprecationWarning`. +The old-style signature will continue to function but will raise a `PendingDeprecationWarning`. ## View names and descriptions @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ The mechanics of how the names and descriptions used in the browseable API are g If you've been customizing this behavior, for example perhaps to use `rst` markup for the browseable API, then you'll need to take a look at the implementation to see what updates you need to make. -Note that the relevant methods have always been private APIs, and the docstrings called them out as intended to be deprecated. +Note that the relevant methods have always been private APIs, and the docstrings called them out as intended to be deprecated. --- diff --git a/docs/topics/documenting-your-api.md b/docs/topics/documenting-your-api.md index e20f9712..d65e251f 100644 --- a/docs/topics/documenting-your-api.md +++ b/docs/topics/documenting-your-api.md @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ The title that is used in the browsable API is generated from the view class nam For example, the view `UserListView`, will be named `User List` when presented in the browsable API. -When working with viewsets, an appropriate suffix is appended to each generated view. For example, the view set `UserViewSet` will generate views named `User List` and `User Instance`. +When working with viewsets, an appropriate suffix is appended to each generated view. For example, the view set `UserViewSet` will generate views named `User List` and `User Instance`. #### Setting the description @@ -65,9 +65,9 @@ If the python `markdown` library is installed, then [markdown syntax][markdown] class AccountListView(views.APIView): """ Returns a list of all **active** accounts in the system. - + For more details on how accounts are activated please [see here][ref]. - + [ref]: http://example.com/activating-accounts """ @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ You can modify the response behavior to `OPTIONS` requests by overriding the `me def metadata(self, request): """ Don't include the view description in OPTIONS responses. - """ + """ data = super(ExampleView, self).metadata(request) data.pop('description') return data diff --git a/docs/topics/kickstarter-announcement.md b/docs/topics/kickstarter-announcement.md index 7d1f6d0e..e8bad95b 100644 --- a/docs/topics/kickstarter-announcement.md +++ b/docs/topics/kickstarter-announcement.md @@ -160,4 +160,4 @@ The following individuals made a significant financial contribution to the devel ### Supporters -There were also almost 300 further individuals choosing to help fund the project at other levels or choosing to give anonymously. Again, thank you, thank you, thank you!
\ No newline at end of file +There were also almost 300 further individuals choosing to help fund the project at other levels or choosing to give anonymously. Again, thank you, thank you, thank you! diff --git a/docs/topics/release-notes.md b/docs/topics/release-notes.md index 88780c3f..9fca949a 100644 --- a/docs/topics/release-notes.md +++ b/docs/topics/release-notes.md @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ You can determine your currently installed version using `pip freeze`: * Bugfix: Fix migration in `authtoken` application. * Bugfix: Allow selection of integer keys in nested choices. * Bugfix: Return `None` instead of `'None'` in `CharField` with `allow_none=True`. -* Bugfix: Ensure custom model fields map to equivelent serializer fields more reliably. +* Bugfix: Ensure custom model fields map to equivelent serializer fields more reliably. * Bugfix: `DjangoFilterBackend` no longer quietly changes queryset ordering. ### 2.4.2 diff --git a/docs/topics/rest-framework-2-announcement.md b/docs/topics/rest-framework-2-announcement.md index f1060d90..a7746932 100644 --- a/docs/topics/rest-framework-2-announcement.md +++ b/docs/topics/rest-framework-2-announcement.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ What it is, and why you should care. --- -**Announcement:** REST framework 2 released - Tue 30th Oct 2012 +**Announcement:** REST framework 2 released - Tue 30th Oct 2012 --- @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ REST framework 2 includes a totally re-worked serialization engine, that was ini * A declarative serialization API, that mirrors Django's `Forms`/`ModelForms` API. * Structural concerns are decoupled from encoding concerns. * Able to support rendering and parsing to many formats, including both machine-readable representations and HTML forms. -* Validation that can be mapped to obvious and comprehensive error responses. +* Validation that can be mapped to obvious and comprehensive error responses. * Serializers that support both nested, flat, and partially-nested representations. * Relationships that can be expressed as primary keys, hyperlinks, slug fields, and other custom representations. diff --git a/docs/topics/writable-nested-serializers.md b/docs/topics/writable-nested-serializers.md index abc6a82f..ed614bd2 100644 --- a/docs/topics/writable-nested-serializers.md +++ b/docs/topics/writable-nested-serializers.md @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Although flat data structures serve to properly delineate between the individual Nested data structures are easy enough to work with if they're read-only - simply nest your serializer classes and you're good to go. However, there are a few more subtleties to using writable nested serializers, due to the dependencies between the various model instances, and the need to save or delete multiple instances in a single action. -## One-to-many data structures +## One-to-many data structures *Example of a **read-only** nested serializer. Nothing complex to worry about here.* @@ -16,10 +16,10 @@ Nested data structures are easy enough to work with if they're read-only - simpl class Meta: model = ToDoItem fields = ('text', 'is_completed') - + class ToDoListSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer): items = ToDoItemSerializer(many=True, read_only=True) - + class Meta: model = ToDoList fields = ('title', 'items') @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Some example output from our serializer. 'items': { {'text': 'Compile playlist', 'is_completed': True}, {'text': 'Send invites', 'is_completed': False}, - {'text': 'Clean house', 'is_completed': False} + {'text': 'Clean house', 'is_completed': False} } } @@ -44,4 +44,4 @@ Let's take a look at updating our nested one-to-many data structure. ### Making PATCH requests -[cite]: http://jsonapi.org/format/#url-based-json-api
\ No newline at end of file +[cite]: http://jsonapi.org/format/#url-based-json-api diff --git a/docs/tutorial/1-serialization.md b/docs/tutorial/1-serialization.md index db5b9ea7..f9027b68 100644 --- a/docs/tutorial/1-serialization.md +++ b/docs/tutorial/1-serialization.md @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ A serializer class is very similar to a Django `Form` class, and includes simila The field flags can also control how the serializer should be displayed in certain circumstances, such as when rendering to HTML. The `style={'type': 'textarea'}` flag above is equivelent to using `widget=widgets.Textarea` on a Django `Form` class. This is particularly useful for controlling how the browsable API should be displayed, as we'll see later in the tutorial. -We can actually also save ourselves some time by using the `ModelSerializer` class, as we'll see later, but for now we'll keep our serializer definition explicit. +We can actually also save ourselves some time by using the `ModelSerializer` class, as we'll see later, but for now we'll keep our serializer definition explicit. ## Working with Serializers |