chouette-core/spec/features/workbenches, branch master Chouette manage transport static data Refs #6920; Fix specs 2018-05-04T07:03:12+00:00 Zog 2018-05-04T07:03:12+00:00 fc427e5807f62416fdc93a8c6dda006137f06537 






Workbenches#show: Don't allow pending referentials to be selected
2018-04-30T15:08:49+00:00

Teddy Wing

2018-04-30T15:08:49+00:00

2fdcbb5a82c23bdaa7e23bd0b3108f404c1e44ea

Disable the checkboxes next to pending referentials. This prevents them
from being deleted by the batch deletion operation.

In general it seems like we shouldn't be operating on pending
referentials, so if any new batch actions are added, it would make sense
to me for the checkboxes to stay disabled.

We want to disallow deletion of pending referentials because this can
put the data in an inconsistent state that requires manual intervention
to clean (I think).

Refs #6858





Disable the checkboxes next to pending referentials. This prevents them
from being deleted by the batch deletion operation.

In general it seems like we shouldn't be operating on pending
referentials, so if any new batch actions are added, it would make sense
to me for the checkboxes to stay disabled.

We want to disallow deletion of pending referentials because this can
put the data in an inconsistent state that requires manual intervention
to clean (I think).

Refs #6858







Refs #6572; Fix specs
2018-04-27T13:13:51+00:00

Zog

2018-04-27T13:07:25+00:00

e1425294874b4cd4d71668e7669220252ea2e936












Fix specs (I18n problem)
2018-04-24T15:41:44+00:00

cedricnjanga

2018-04-24T15:41:44+00:00

1fd02d51c9fd78900a24f176600c5ee23caaf4cf












Refs #5863 @6h; Remove workbench id from the querystring
2018-02-20T09:20:18+00:00

Zog

2018-02-08T09:33:46+00:00

3dcea81c627c1c740630ce7306bac55256ce8037

Infer it when possible, and use a nested otherwise





Infer it when possible, and use a nested otherwise







workbenches/show: Filter referentials by workgroup
2018-01-16T16:24:12+00:00

Teddy Wing

2018-01-16T16:24:12+00:00

93b60066cc49d699171d6a50798c5939a4644eea

Previously, all `Referential`s would be listed on this page if they had
matching line metadata. Now, we exclude those referentials that are in
other workgroups to ensure users don't see referentials they're not
supposed to see.

Refs #5592





Previously, all `Referential`s would be listed on this page if they had
matching line metadata. Now, we exclude those referentials that are in
other workgroups to ensure users don't see referentials they're not
supposed to see.

Refs #5592







workbenches_show_spec: Test organisations in filtration list
2018-01-15T17:25:52+00:00

Teddy Wing

2018-01-15T16:36:58+00:00

88b1e7c640d89d5bb435e4e415105b071ef0d457

Check that only `Organisation`s associated with the current `Workgroup`
appear in the list of filters on `Workbenches#show`.

Also rewrite the `other_referential` object to put it in a different
workbench from the first referential, enabling us to have multiple
organisations in the same `Workgroup`.

Refs #5140





Check that only `Organisation`s associated with the current `Workgroup`
appear in the list of filters on `Workbenches#show`.

Also rewrite the `other_referential` object to put it in a different
workbench from the first referential, enabling us to have multiple
organisations in the same `Workgroup`.

Refs #5140







Refs: #5198@1.5h; Specing the presence of the Modal Action Box
2017-12-07T19:53:43+00:00

Robert

2017-12-07T07:08:11+00:00

b07c6d9c198c9417981a143b04698ff52db91024

  - verifying the visibility of the action box
  - no dynamic behavior of the action box is verified (yet?) - would need javascript execution
  - refactoring suggestions --> https://projects.af83.io/issues/5206





  - verifying the visibility of the action box
  - no dynamic behavior of the action box is verified (yet?) - would need javascript execution
  - refactoring suggestions --> https://projects.af83.io/issues/5206