chouette-core/db, branch 3521-workbench_output_controller Chouette manage transport static data Refs: #4461@0.75h; Fixing netex_import after_create callback to after_commit on: :create 2017-11-17T13:53:03+00:00 Robert 2017-11-17T10:32:47+00:00 86082170302a5b07dc15fbc61b628bb89b775f04 






Merge branch '4516_cleanup_rule_parameter_set'
2017-11-17T11:09:42+00:00

Xinhui

2017-11-17T11:07:58+00:00

1261698d213964a3391fe1880198da00e7ac9831












Remove migration
2017-11-17T11:04:51+00:00

Xinhui

2017-11-17T11:04:41+00:00

219af774c2d589446133bda55aa0f001d6526181

Refs #4516





Refs #4516







Remove rule parameter set route
2017-11-14T11:12:41+00:00

Xinhui

2017-11-14T10:39:28+00:00

cc785a55c485a3a69f917c183c00db18a9de6614

Refs #4516
Removel rule parameter set from migration





Refs #4516
Removel rule parameter set from migration







Drop table rule_parameter_sets
2017-11-14T11:12:30+00:00

Xinhui

2017-11-14T10:28:09+00:00

a534fbac065dfd9cebbe83bb3f596a39610dc4be

Refs #4516





Refs #4516







Refs #4952 Add conidtion to display ComplianceControlBlock edit button depending on user permissions
2017-11-13T17:01:39+00:00

cedricnjanga

2017-11-13T17:01:11+00:00

96afaed78fa043449c0264ea09f0106147755c8e












compliance_check_resources: Rename `type` column to `resource_type`
2017-11-13T10:15:17+00:00

Teddy Wing

2017-11-13T10:15:17+00:00

bc0964d3be07943ee3f68978a7a6be142cb12e41

The Java application needs a `resource_type` column to be able to store
the class/object that was validated by the resource's check. Since we
don't need or want Single Table Inheritance on this table, rename the
existing `type` field to `resource_type`.

Refs #4953





The Java application needs a `resource_type` column to be able to store
the class/object that was validated by the resource's check. Since we
don't need or want Single Table Inheritance on this table, rename the
existing `type` field to `resource_type`.

Refs #4953







Change `compliance_check_set_id` to `bigint`
2017-11-10T13:08:12+00:00

Teddy Wing

2017-11-10T13:08:12+00:00

5538c5dc2c81d98bd9f069d4fd859cd79b8b0756

I had missed this one in 63d85933ac99453c76df7cda102a4f60d94f5f53.
Thanks a lot to Robert for scouring the fields and finding it.

Since the v2 migration was irreversible, add a new one to change the
type of this foreign key.

Refs #4947





I had missed this one in 63d85933ac99453c76df7cda102a4f60d94f5f53.
Thanks a lot to Robert for scouring the fields and finding it.

Since the v2 migration was irreversible, add a new one to change the
type of this foreign key.

Refs #4947







Migrate all foreign keys to `bigint` from `integer`
2017-11-10T12:00:36+00:00

Teddy Wing

2017-11-10T12:00:36+00:00

63d85933ac99453c76df7cda102a4f60d94f5f53

All our primary keys are supposed to be `bigint`s, and our foreign keys
should likewise be `bigint`s. But it's easy to forget this when creating
migrations, or some committers might not have been up to speed on the
convention. In any case, this changes all existing foreign keys to be
`bigint`s.

Need to get this out now so that Michel Etienne can use it to correctly
test the Java application for compliance check validations. That's why
I'm not including any future-looking checks or enforcements here. That
will be coming next.

Refs #4947





All our primary keys are supposed to be `bigint`s, and our foreign keys
should likewise be `bigint`s. But it's easy to forget this when creating
migrations, or some committers might not have been up to speed on the
convention. In any case, this changes all existing foreign keys to be
`bigint`s.

Need to get this out now so that Michel Etienne can use it to correctly
test the Java application for compliance check validations. That's why
I'm not including any future-looking checks or enforcements here. That
will be coming next.

Refs #4947







Remove RouteSection from SetUpdatedAt migration. Refs #4944
2017-11-10T07:45:40+00:00

Alban Peignier

2017-11-10T07:45:40+00:00

3967389c4ef2d7af07cea87d4b3a6f1473022aef