| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Pinned formulae which were pinned at a previous version but then upgraded
would not be listed by `brew list --pinned`. This is due to the good old
"File.exist? thinks broken symlinks don't exist" gotcha, so the test in
the select block in list_pinned has been changed to check if the pin file
exists _or_ is a symlink.
Closes Homebrew/homebrew#20423.
Signed-off-by: Jack Nagel <jacknagel@gmail.com>
|
|
These are class method calls, not some special keyword, and should be
indented as such (also all standard Ruby indenters do this).
|
|
Fixes Homebrew/homebrew#18885.
|
|
* Added `pin` et. al. to manpage.
* Added `brew pin` to `brew.1` * Added `brew unpin` to `brew.1`
* Added `brew list --pinned` to `brew.1`
* Added information about frozen formulae to `brew upgrade` in `brew.1`
* Added `pin` et.al. to completion scripts.
* Unpin formulae when uninstalling them
* Unpin and re-pin formulae when upgrading (avoids stale symlink)
References Homebrew/homebrew#18386.
Closes Homebrew/homebrew#18515.
Signed-off-by: Mike McQuaid <mike@mikemcquaid.com>
|
|
|
|
* lets more text types get picked up
* better filter for `brew list`
|
|
If you have relocated your HOMEBREW_CACHE under HOMEBREW_PREFIX,
then don't show these files as "unbrewed".
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jack Nagel <jacknagel@gmail.com>
|
|
|
|
If the Cellar doesn't exist yet, don't print an error message or exit
with an error status.
Fixes Homebrew/homebrew#14503.
|
|
Fixes Homebrew/homebrew#8615.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The code was sucking. To the extent that maintenance was hard. It's a lot
easier to work with code that is sensibly split at sensible boundaries. So
now it is more like that.
But the refactor is minimal. Because we don't want you to have more merge
hell than absolutely necessary.
If you merge you will need to pay attention to brew.h.rb (as it is deleted)
and bin/brew (as command logic is gone). It will be painful, but you will just
have to help git out by moving any changes around manually.
Note compatibility.rb. It ensures that any function renames or removals don't
break anything. We're pretty serious about backwards compatibility. And that's
because we encourage you to hack around with the innards. And we couldn't do
that if we would then just make stuff disappear behind your back.
|