| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Just a tiny fixup, that's all.
Closes #6317
|
|
|
|
To keep the same logic as the commit https://github.com/angular/angular.js/commit/2e641ac49f121a6e2cc70bd3879930b44a8a7710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Really the doc-gen process should escape there but for now this should
stop the layout from breaking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The links to code elements have now changed: api/ng.directive:ngClick ->
api/ng/directive/ngClick.
Examples now run inside iframes, so we need to instruct Protractor to
switch to the example iframe.
|
|
The protractor tests were failing because the spans containing the icons
were not displaying anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even though it is defined in the auto folder, it makes more sense for this
function to appear in the ng module in the docs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is problematic to use {@link} tags with external links because the
markdown parser converts them to links for us before we parse the @links.
This means that the following tag:
```
{@link http://www.google.com Google}
```
get converted to:
```
{@link <a href="http://www.google.com/"></a> Google}
```
Our {@link} parser then converts this to:
```
<a href="<a"><</a>href="http://www.google.com/"></a> Google}
```
which is clearly a mess. The best solution is not to use {@link} tags
for external links and just use the standard markdown syntax:
```
[Google](http://www.google.com)
```
In the long run, we could look into configuring or modifying `marked` not
to convert these external links or we could provide a "pre-parser"
processor that dealt with such links before `marked` gets its hands on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The generator is able to imply the module from the containing folder for
most files but these are in the ng module but are stored at the root folder.
|
|
the empty string
The previous code for filtering out non-finite numbers was broken, as it would convert `null` to `0`,
as well as arrays.
This change fixes this by converting null/undefined/NaN/Infinity/any object to the empty string.
Closes #6188
Closes #6261
|
|
|
|
BREAKING CHANGE: ngClass and {{ class }} will now call the `setClass`
animation callback instead of addClass / removeClass when both a
addClass/removeClass operation is being executed on the element during the animation.
Please include the setClass animation callback as well as addClass and removeClass within
your JS animations to work with ngClass and {{ class }} directives.
Closes #6019
|
|
being animated
BREAKING CHANGE: Both the `$animate:before` and `$animate:after` DOM events must be now
registered prior to the $animate operation taking place. The `$animate:close` event
can be registered anytime afterwards.
DOM callbacks used to fired for each and every animation operation that occurs within the
$animate service provided in the ngAnimate module. This may end up slowing down an
application if 100s of elements are being inserted into the page. Therefore after this
change callbacks are only fired if registered on the element being animated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the first element in a template is a <tr>, <th>, <td>, or <tbody> tag,
the HTML compiler will ensure that the template is wrapped in a <table>
element so that the table content is not discarded.
Closes #2848
Closes #1459
Closes #3647
Closes #3241
|
|
textInput shouldn't be applied to file inputs to ease writing of custom file input directives.
This change prevents file inputs from instantiating the text input parser/formatter pipelines.
Closes #6247
Closes #6231
|
|
Because of a4e6d962, model is not updated on input/change between the
compositionstart and compositionend events. Unfortunately, the compositionend
event does not always happen prior to an input/change event.
This changeset calls the listener function to update the model after a
compositionend event is received.
Closes #6058
Closes #5433
|
|
The markup here was missing the methods_ prefix and behaved incorrectly.
Closes #5802
|
|
Previously missing the methods_ prefix.
Closes #5798
|
|
Closes #6229
|
|
Closes #6224
|
|
added missing closing tag to ngApp example.
Closes #6066
|
|
jQuery.fn.on/off docs
Сorrect link.
Closes #6171
|
|
Due to 339a165, it became impossible to filter nested properties of an object using the filterFilter.
A proposed solution to this was to enable the use of nested predicate objects. This change enables the
use of these nested predicate objects.
Example:
```html
<div ng-repeat="it in items | filter:{ address: { country: 'Canuckistan'}}"></div>
```
Or
```js
$filter('filter')(items, { address: { country: 'Canuckistan' } });
```
Closes #6215
Related to #6009
|
|
Since we now pass in the transclusion function directly to the link function, we no longer need
the old scheme whereby we saved the transclude function injected into the controller for later
use in during linking.
Additionally, this change may aid in correcting a memory leak of detached DOM nodes (see #6181
for details).
This commit removes the controller and simplifies ngTransclude.
Closes #5375
Closes #6181
|
|
The documentation states only the "action" attribute triggers this, which is incorrect. When using
the attribute "data-action" (as for AJAX control, attempting to bypass the "action" attribute but
still make it obvious what its for), Angular thinks this is also classified as "action" and
continues with the page submission.
Closes #6196
|
|
comment element
This corrects a complicated compiler issue, described in detail below:
Previously, if an element transclusion directive contained an asynchronous directive whose template
contained another element transclusion directive, the inner element transclusion directive would be
linked with the element, rather than the expected comment node.
An example manifestation of this bug would look like so:
```html
<div ng-repeat="i in [1,2,3,4,5]">
<div my-directive>
</div>
</div>
```
`my-directive` would be a replace directive, and its template would contain another element
transclusion directive, like so:
```html
<div ng-if="true">{{i}}</div>
```
ngIf would be linked with this template content, rather than the comment node, and the template element
would be attached to the DOM, rather than the comment. As a result, this caused ng-if to duplicate the
template when its expression evaluated to true.
Closes #6006
Closes #6101
|
