| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BREAKING CHANGE: ngClass and {{ class }} will now call the `setClass`
animation callback instead of addClass / removeClass when both a
addClass/removeClass operation is being executed on the element during the animation.
Please include the setClass animation callback as well as addClass and removeClass within
your JS animations to work with ngClass and {{ class }} directives.
Closes #6019
|
|
If the first element in a template is a <tr>, <th>, <td>, or <tbody> tag,
the HTML compiler will ensure that the template is wrapped in a <table>
element so that the table content is not discarded.
Closes #2848
Closes #1459
Closes #3647
Closes #3241
|
|
comment element
This corrects a complicated compiler issue, described in detail below:
Previously, if an element transclusion directive contained an asynchronous directive whose template
contained another element transclusion directive, the inner element transclusion directive would be
linked with the element, rather than the expected comment node.
An example manifestation of this bug would look like so:
```html
<div ng-repeat="i in [1,2,3,4,5]">
<div my-directive>
</div>
</div>
```
`my-directive` would be a replace directive, and its template would contain another element
transclusion directive, like so:
```html
<div ng-if="true">{{i}}</div>
```
ngIf would be linked with this template content, rather than the comment node, and the template element
would be attached to the DOM, rather than the comment. As a result, this caused ng-if to duplicate the
template when its expression evaluated to true.
Closes #6006
Closes #6101
|
|
"how to" was written twice in a row.
Closes #6110
|
|
directives
Previously, classes added to asynchronous directive elements during the clone
attach function would not persist after the node is merged with the template, prior
to linking. This change corrects this behaviour and brings it in line with synchronous
directives.
Closes #5439
Closes #5617
|
|
protractor
Thanks to jeffbcross, petebacondarwin, btford, jdeboer, tbosch for contributions!
Closes #6023
|
|
Closes #5639
|
|
Closes #5599
|
|
It appears that this exceptional case was only valid for IE<8 and that for IE>=8 it
was actually causing a bug with the `ng-href-attr` directive on `<a>` elements.
Closes #5479
|
|
Add class ng-scope to dom nodes during directive compile rather than link.
Optimize handling of nodeLists.
This results in a savings of about 130ms during the startup of a product within Google.
Closes #5471
|
|
Closes #5310
|
|
jQuery's elem.html('') is way slower than elem.empty(). As clearing
element contents happens quite often in certain scenarios, switching
to using .empty() provides a significant performance boost when using
Angular with jQuery.
Closes #4457
|
|
When a component uses an isolate scope reference
and the the component is used with an object literal
a new object is created on every evaluation.
Therefore the compiler needs to compare
the values of the parent and the isolate scope
using object equality and not object reference
equality.
Fixes #5296.
|
|
If an element has a directive whose content is loaded using `templateUrl`,
and the element is cloned using a linking function before the template arrives,
the clone needs to be updated as well.
This also updates `ngIf` and `ngRepeat` to keep the connection to the clone
of a tranclude function, so that they know about the changes a directive with
`templateUrl` does to the element in the future.
Fixes to #4930.
|
|
When using two-way binding with isolate scope, under some circumstances
the lastValue variable captured in the parentValueWatch function can get
out of sync.
Specifically, if both the value in the origin scope as well as the value
in the isolate scope get independently updated to the same value within
one digest cycle, the lastValue is never updated. This potentially causes
the watch to make the wrong decision as to which side to update on subsequent
passes.
This fixes things by ensuring lastValue is always set to the last seen
value even if the watch's logic was short circuited because there was no
difference between the values in the original and isolate scopes.
Closes #5182
|
|
|
|
`$sanitize` now uses the same mechanism as `$compile` to validate uris.
By this, the validation in `$sanitize` is more general and can be
configured in the same way as the one in `$compile`.
Changes
- Creates the new private service `$$sanitizeUri`.
- Moves related specs from `compileSpec.js` into `sanitizeUriSpec.js`.
- Refactors the `linky` filter to be less dependent on `$sanitize`
internal functions.
Fixes #3748.
|
|
Closes #5133
|
|
Require bindings to form[action] to be $sce.RESOURCE_URL and bindings to
iframe[srcdoc] to be $sce.HTML
Closes #4927
Closes #4933
|
|
When $compile interpolates a CSS class attribute expression it will
do so by comparing the CSS class value already present on the element.
This may lead to unexpected results when dealing with ngClass values being
added and removed therefore it is best that both compile and ngClass delegate
addClass/removeClass operations to the same block of code.
|
|
ngClass works by removing all the former classes and then adding all the
new classes to the element during each watch change operation. This may
cause transition animations to never render. The ngClass directive will
now only add and remove the classes that change during each watch operation.
Closes #4960
Closes #4944
|
|
Additional API (backwards compatible)
- Injects `$transclude` (see directive controllers) as 5th argument to directive link functions.
- `$transclude` takes an optional scope as first parameter that overrides the
bound scope.
Deprecations:
- `transclude` parameter of directive compile functions (use the new parameter for link functions instead).
Refactorings:
- Don't use comment node to temporarily store controllers
- `ngIf`, `ngRepeat`, ... now all use `$transclude`
Closes #4935.
|
|
|
|
Update the $compile docs to mention the change introduced in #4266.
Closes #4843
|
|
A directive with a template with `replace: true` and an interpolated style at the root element should work correctly.
Closes #4882.
|
|
See doc update in the diff for more info.
BREAKING CHANGE: jqLite#scope() does not return the isolate scope on the element
that triggered directive with isolate scope. Use jqLite#isolateScope() instead.
|
|
used multiple times
When an isolate scope directive is also a "replace" directive and at the root of its template
it has other directives, we need to keep track remember to use isolate scope when linking
these.
This commit fixes the leakage of this state when this directive is used again later inside
or outside of the isolate directive template.
|
|
Fixes an issue when we didn't share the isolate scope with the controller
of the directive from the isolate directive's template when this directive
was replaced onto the isolate directive element.
|
|
|
|
isolate directive
I had to fix one unit test, as it assumed the broken behavior, where application template gets the
isolate scope of other (isolate) directive, rather than the regular scope.
BREAKING CHANGE: Child elements that are defined either in the application template or in some other
directives template do not get the isolate scope. In theory, nobody should rely on this behavior, as
it is very rare - in most cases the isolate directive has a template.
|
|
Fixes issue with isolate scope leaking all over the place into other directives on the same element.
Isolate scope is now available only to the isolate directive that requested it and its template.
A non-isolate directive should not get the isolate scope of an isolate directive on the same element,
instead they will receive the original scope (which is the parent scope of the newly created isolate scope).
Paired with Tobias.
BREAKING CHANGE: Directives without isolate scope do not get the isolate scope from an isolate directive on the same element. If your code depends on this behavior (non-isolate directive needs to access state from within the isolate scope), change the isolate directive to use scope locals to pass these explicitly.
// before
<input ng-model="$parent.value" ng-isolate>
.directive('ngIsolate', function() {
return {
scope: {},
template: '{{value}}'
};
});
// after
<input ng-model="value" ng-isolate>
.directive('ngIsolate', function() {
return {
scope: {value: '=ngModel'},
template: '{{value}}
};
});
Closes #1924
Closes #2500
|
|
|
|
When using ngIf with ngInclude on the same element, ngIf previously did not remove
elements added by ngInclude. Similarly, when using ngIfStart/End, ngIf will miss
elements added between the start/end markers added after ngIf is linked.
This commit changes the behavior of ngIf to add a comment node at the end of its
elements such that elements between the starting comment and this ending comment
are removed when ngIf's predicate does not hold.
|
|
directives
This is a fix for regression introduced last week by faf5b980.
Closes #4654
|
|
Recently we changed the priority of attribute interpolation directive to -100
to ensure that it executes early in the post linking phase. This causes issues
with when terminal directives are placed on elements with attribute bindings
because the terminal directive will usually have 0 or higher priority which
results in attr interpolation directive not being applied to the element.
To fix this issue I'm switching the priority back to 100 and making moving the
binding setup into the pre-linking function.
This means that:
- terminal directives with priority lower than 100 will not affect the attribute
binding
- if a directive wants to add or alter bindings it can do so in the pre-linking
phase, as long as the priority of this directive is more than 100
- all post-linking functions will execute after the attribute binding has been
set up
- all pre-linking functions with directive priority lower than 100 will execute
after the attribute bindings have been setup
BREAKING CHANGE: the attribute interpolation (binding) executes as a directive
with priority 100 and the binding is set up in the pre-linking phase. It used
to be that the priority was -100 in rc.2 (100 before rc.2) and that the binding
was setup in the post-linking phase.
Closes #4525
Closes #4528
Closes #4649
|
|
Closes #4589
|
|
When we re-enter compilation either due to async directive templates or element transclude directive
we need to keep track of controllers to instantiate during linking.
This piece of info was missing when re-entering compilation and that's what this commit fixes.
I also reordered the properties in the previousCompileContext object.
Closes #4434
Closes #4616
|
|
|
|
|
|
This also contains some whitespace corrections by my editor.
|
|
Issue an error and abort compilation when two directives that ask for transclusion are found
on a single element. This configuration is not supported and we previously failed to issue
the error because in the case of element transclusion the compilation is re-started and this
caused the compilation context to be lost.
The ngRepeat directive has been special-cased to bypass this warning because it knows how to
handle this scenario internally.
This is not an ideal solution to the problem of multiple transclusions per element, we are
hoping to have this configuration supported by the compiler in the future. See #4357.
Closes #3893
Closes #4217
Closes #3307
|
|
Array.prototype.sort is speced out to be as potentionally unstable sort,
which is how it's implemented in FF and IE. This has caused the order
of directives with the same priority to vary between browsers.
For consistency sake, we now consider directive name and registration,
order when determining the order of directives with the same priority.
Note: it is still possible to get into a situation when the directive
order is underministic - when source files are loaded asynchronously
in non-deterministic order and there are are directives registered
with the same name and priority, the order in which they will be applied
will depend on the file load order.
|
|
|
|
The location service, and other portions of the application,
were relying on a complicated regular expression to get parts of a URL.
But there is already a private urlUtils provider,
which relies on HTMLAnchorElement to provide this information,
and is suitable for most cases.
In order to make urlUtils more accessible in the absence of DI,
its methods were converted to standalone functions available globally.
The urlUtils.resolve method was renamed urlResolve,
and was refactored to only take 1 argument, url,
and not the 2nd "parse" boolean.
The method now always returns a parsed url.
All places in code which previously wanted a string instead of a parsed
url can now get the value from the href property of the returned object.
Tests were also added to ensure IPv6 addresses were handled correctly.
Closes #3533
Closes #2950
Closes #3249
|
